>> - Change the negotiation so that user name is not exchanged in the clear
>> - Change key exchange to do PFS
>TLS-pwd already supports both of these. It also supports ECC too,
>which is problematic with the current SRP protocol.
I agree: Instead of modifying SRP I would prefer introducing a n
>> TLS-pwd already supports both of these. It also supports ECC too,
>> which is problematic with the current SRP protocol.
>In the language of the CFRG draft, TLS-pwd is “balanced” where SRP is
“augmented”,
>so they’re not really equivalent, correct?
Correct.
>This is possible, but you’d need
very welcome.
Best regards,
Jörn
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 17:03
An: Schmidt, Jörn-Marc; Schmidt, Jörn-Marc; "Dennis Kügler"; Dennis Kuegler
Betreff: New Version Notification