On Aug 25, 2016 04:08, "Tony Arcieri" wrote:
> Should there be a 3DES "diediedie"?
Strongly +1.
Makers of tiny devices with legacy chips will simply keep on using whatever
they want anyway. This is not a good reason to drag risk for everyone with
us forevermore.
Richard
___
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> [a lot of really interesting stuff]
Thanks for the write-up. To focus what you wrote back on the thread at hand:
Is it correct when I say that the embedded programmers you talked to
don't care about any form of DES as they need/must/prefer t
