his
is the right place to consider, but would DTLS 1.3(?) be able to encrypt
headers and still handle packet loss and re-ordering? If DTLS needs cleartext
headers, would it be better to advise one approach for both protocols?
Regards,
Mike Copley
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
On 7/07/2016, at 10:37 am, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 07/07/16 09:13, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> does not make the situation any worse
>> than we have today.
>
> I don't accept that is the correct goal. That form of
> argument is what lead to us standardising the HTTP
> Forwarded header
