> The strawman in my DISCUSS was that bursts of <= 2 packets could
> be more aggressive; that's a negotiable number, and the de jure
> TCP 4*MSS initial window, for example, is one I can easily be
> persuaded of.
Well.
On the standards track you're correct (RFC 3390 & 5681).
However, RFC 6928 s
Folks-
I am appending what I sent Martin & Gorry this morning. I looked
quite quickly as Martin was looking for quick input. I am happy to
iterate if things aren't all that understandable.
allman
[Quick hit.]
I agree with Martin's DISCUSS and Gorry's notes. A couple more
things here ...
>
Hi Ekr!
> This means that we have rather more latitude in terms of how
> aggressively we retransmit because it only applies to a small
> fraction of the traffic.
(Strikes me as a bit of a weird formulation.)
> Firefox uses 50ms and AIUI Chrome
> uses a value derived from the ICE handshake (whic
