[TLS] draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt

2022-04-06 Thread Kenneth Vaughn
Magnolia, TX 77354 +1-936-647-1910 +1-571-331-5670 cell kvau...@trevilon.com www.trevilon.com > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt > Date: April 6, 2022 at 6:38:45 PM CDT > To

Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt

2022-04-11 Thread Kenneth Vaughn
TLSTM was the name given to it by RFC 6353 and does provide the full context (i.e. a transport model), so I am hesitant to change that part, but I don't see any problem with calling it SNMP-TLSTM registry. I will make that change in the next version. Regards, Ken Vaughn Trevilon LLC 6606 FM 14

Re: [TLS] How are we planning to deprecate TLS 1.2?

2023-03-03 Thread Kenneth Vaughn
+1 on the idea, but I am not convinced that the proposed process is sufficient (and/or terms are not adequately clear). It seems to me that the time "for everyone to upgrade" will be dependent upon market factors related to the technology being replaced as well as with the severeness of the pr