It appears that Jim Reid said:
>
>
>> On 26 Jun 2022, at 14:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> So where do I ask where CERT records are being used?
>
>Maybe in the dnsop WG. Or at the DNS-OARC meeting immediately after IETF114.
The authors of the CERT RFC are still around. Meybe they'd know.
Hi from DNS land.
>pinning, but i won't go too far into the weeds here. Just a quick
>summary of my understanding:
>
> * The existence of a pin only requires that the service operator
> maintain the ability to respond to this extension in the future -- it
> doesn't require specific keys, or e
test only
--
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
In article you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>One comment. Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the
>antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case
>No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014).
That's a single page dismissing 3GPP from the case. Really?
https:
In article <9af29b8f-856e-eb3f-6f12-e4cb0a866...@cs.tcd.ie> you write:
>On 08/03/2020 14:46, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
>>
>> TLS is particular has a history going back to 1986 when the platform was
>> first announced by the USG and the TLS specification was instantiated
>> initially in the GOSIP stand
It appears that Bob Beck said:
>
>
>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 12:20 PM, Dang, Quynh H. (Fed)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe consensus calls can only be made and completed at the in-person
>> meetings ?
>
>The problem with in-person (or even virtual at the in-person meetings) is it
>then becomes even mor
