Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque

2021-03-31 Thread Hao, Feng
If this follows from the IETF PAKE selection, was OPAQUE-3DH proposed and reviewed during the selection process? https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/Candidates/OPAQUE.md Cheers, Feng From: TLS on behalf of Joseph Salowey Date: Wednesday, 31 March 2021 at 05:40 To: Subject: [TL

Re: [TLS] Elliptic Curve J-PAKE

2019-04-15 Thread Hao, Feng
Hi Watson, On 15/04/2019, 00:39, "TLS on behalf of Watson Ladd" wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:36 PM Feng Hao wrote: > > Hi Watson, > > When the attacker knows the relation, besides the active attack, there may > be other things he can exploit. This however is not us

Re: [TLS] Selfie attack was Re: Distinguishing between external/resumption PSKs

2019-09-24 Thread Hao, Feng
On 23/09/2019, 18:50, "TLS on behalf of Mohit Sethi M" wrote: Hi all, On the topic of external PSKs in TLS 1.3, I found a publication on the Selfie attack: https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/347 Perhaps this was already discussed on the list. I thought that sharing it

Re: [TLS] Selfie attack was Re: Distinguishing between external/resumption PSKs

2019-09-24 Thread Hao, Feng
t looked at what the definitions in [BBFGKZ16] say). Cheers, John -Original Message- From: TLS on behalf of "Hao, Feng" Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2019 at 16:09 To: Mohit Sethi M , "Owen Friel (ofriel)" , Jonathan Hoyland

Re: [TLS] Selfie attack was Re: Distinguishing between external/resumption PSKs

2019-10-09 Thread Hao, Feng
information can be fed: > > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-01#append >ix-B > >Best, >Chris > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Hao, Feng wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Reflection attacks are indeed older, but the selfie attack