[TLS] Internet-Draft on TLS resumption across Server Name Indications

2019-03-04 Thread Erik Sy
find an Internet-Draft describing such a simple TLS extension [2]. I will be at the IETF 104 in Prague to present and discuss this topic. I ask you for feedback on this topic and welcome your contributions to this Internet-Draft [3]. Thanks in advance for your feedback. Best, Erik Sy [1]

Re: [TLS] draft-sy-tls-resumption-group comments

2019-03-20 Thread Erik Sy
Dear Martin, thanks for reading the draft and commenting on it. You point out, that there exist similarities between the draft and connection coalescing in HTTP/2 and a solution in HTTP can somehow solve the described performance problem. As I understand it, connection coalescing in HTTP/2 is im

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-sy-tls-resumption-group

2019-04-16 Thread Erik Sy
Hi Martin, can you please explain, why you think this is not the right solution? To start the discussion, I provide below some insights on why I ended up with this solution. Question 1: Shall the problem be solved by a cross-layer solution or by a TLS-only approach? Arguments for a TLS-only app

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-sy-tls-resumption-group

2019-04-26 Thread Erik Sy
On 4/26/19 08:45, Victor Vasiliev wrote: > > From the technical standpoint, I agree with Martin that a > NewSessionTicket extension would be a better fit, but this is > something that we can figure out later without much trouble. I agree with Martin and Victor, that the NewSessionTicket extension i