ng).
> It pays to look again at David Wagner's slides from 2005, on sensor
> nets and crypto:
> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~daw/talks/sens-oak05.pdf
>
>
> --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623
On Wed, August 31, 2016 3:48 pm, Hilarie Orman wrote:
>
> An ARM is far too much hardware to throw at "read sensor/munge data/send
> data".
What about an 8051?
> Hilarie
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
de...@ihtfp.com
"Steven M. Bellovin" writes:
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 10:17, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> "Steven M. Bellovin" writes:
>>
>>> Yes. To a large extent, the "IoT devices are too puny for real
>>> crypto" is a hangover from several years
" and we, as security professionals, should encourage
"as strong security as possble" without getting the manufacturers to
just say "sorry, too expensive, I'll go without." (which is,
unfortunately, exactly what's been happening)
> Hilarie
-derek
--
#x27;s possible.
Payments are a very poor example.. Several seconds per transaction?
That's not usable performance. Look at all the pushback from consumers
that have been happening since the changeover to chip cards in the US
this past year.
> Tony Arcieri
-derek
--
Derek Atk
s, so some academic attack that would take 500
> million years to acquire the necessary data isn't going to lose anyone any
> sleep. It's a nice piece of work, but you need to look at what practical
> effect it has on real, deployed systems...
EXACTLY!
> Peter.
-derek
