Hi all,
I am also struggling a bit with the nonce construction for DTLS 1.3 now that we
have moved to a 128-bit record_number.
The TLS 1.3 per-record nonce for the AEAD construction is formed as follows:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-5.3
1. The 64-bit record sequence
Hi,
I've a query on the reconstruction of the sequence number from the DTLS 1.3
specification:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9147.html#name-reconstructing-the-sequence
"If the epoch bits match those of the current epoch, then implementations
SHOULD reconstruct the sequence number by computi
Greetings all.
I was wondering could someone help clarify my understanding on the use of
length fields for DTLS 1.2 + CID with respect to TLS1.3, specifically with the
additional data input to the AEAD functions.
If we start with the DTLS1.2 + CID's RFC:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9146