Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 9:33 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2818,
> "HTTP Over TLS".
>
> --
> You may review the report
Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> On Sep 8, 2021, at 5:02 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2246,
> "The TLS Protocol Version 1.0".
>
> --
> You may
Greetings,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
https://www.rf
Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 3:39 PM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7507,
> "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol
> Downgrade
Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> On Apr 1, 2022, at 8:39 PM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7507,
> "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol
> Downgrade
Hi Paul,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to
“Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type
accordingly (see the definitions at
https://www.rfc-ed
H Paul,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
https://www.rfc-edi
