Dear WG members,
I am quite astonished that the brainpool curves are eventually prohibited in
TLS 1.3. Based on an earlier comment
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17204.html), I would have
thought that the brainpool curves will be allowed in any future version,
especial
As I understand from the text, the Brainpool curves itself are not prohibited,
but the code points assigned to them. So, if people still want to use the
Brainpool curves in conformance with the standard, I would conclude that they
can request new code points. This would result in an IANA registr
; Manfred Lochter; Bruckert, Leonie
Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Leonie Bruckert and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft
. Nevertheless, we
appreciate constructive criticism.
Leonie
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. September 2018 21:11
An: Bruckert, Leonie
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for
draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13
We really don't want to restart the old debate. That's why we don't target
standardization, but registration of code points only. Maybe you got this wrong.
RFC8447 adds a RECOMMENDED column to TLS Registries which allows for
differentiating between entries explicitly recommended by an RFC and ot
See my response inline.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hubert Kario [mailto:hka...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2018 13:19
An: tls@ietf.org
Cc: Bruckert, Leonie
Betreff: Re: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for
draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt
*** gpg4o | Die E
