I strongly support this work as it represents capabilities that are being
developed, deployed and used in practice. It has good intentions and provides a
good approach in the context of defense in depth approaches. No security cannot
be just on both ends of the communication. One can dream about
I am really surprised how the answers you don't like are systematically put on
denial. Can you explain me what leads you to think that some people here are
not concerned by the list of people you list? this is an assumption and the
wrong assumption.
Perhaps on the contrary we are concerned BOTH
n and avoid rehashing the previous
> debate regarding draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility, parts of this draft should
> be rescoped or removed. Authors are free to take this material to an AD and
> seek sponsorship, or to the ISE/IAB for further guidance.
>
> Cheers
+1, neutrality is appreciated, thank you Sean
Collecting expressed views should prevail in a neutral way, there is no reason
why inappropriate behaviour should be tolerated and let the impression that the
loudest voice is prevailing
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
