Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0?

2.0, generally against /2, 3.4, 4.0, etc. and perfectly fine leaving it as 1.3. -- Adam Caudill a...@adamcaudill.com http://adamcaudill.com/ ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3

established solutions to address your issues. -- Adam Caudill a...@adamcaudill.com http://adamcaudill.com/ > On Sep 23, 2016, at 5:34 PM, BITS Security > wrote: > >> you can keep using TLS1.2 in your internal network, can't you? > > There are both public and privat

Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

reevaluate (not that I expect consensus to emerge then either). -- --*Adam Caudill* http://adamcaudill.com ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls