Salz, Rich writes:
>This isn't right.
>
>We held up on advancing the frozen draft until we thought TLS-LTS was through
>the ISE process.
I pointed this out to the ISE editor but he just ignored it and blocked
publication anyway.
What's the appeal/review mechanism for getting this misuse of the
Thank you for the review.
1) Section 1
"This document specifies that outside of urgent security fixes, and the
exceptions listed in Section 4, no changes will be approved for TLS 1.2."
Following the conversations, it seems like the goal is for IETF to not adopt or
approve work related to TLS 1.
Issues
--
* tlswg/rfc8447bis (+0/-2/💬0)
2 issues closed:
- Address SecDir review comments https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/issues/69
- Address SecDir review comments https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/issues/69
* tlswg/tls12-frozen (+0/-2/💬2)
2 issues received 2 new comments:
-
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
RFC 4846 states that you may ask the IAB to review the ISE's decision.Â
If they choose to do so (they don't have to), they may advise the ISE to
reconsider. You are welcome to use this route. If the IAB does advise
me to reconsider, I certainly will do so. I have made mistakes before.
Eliot
