Adam,
Thanks for your comments. The WG discussed the question of guidance for
key rotation and came to the conclusion that we didn't have much useful
to say as a consensus matter, so we opted to remain silent.
-Ekr
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 12:45 PM Adam Montville via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.or
> On Mar 15, 2025, at 9:34 PM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 15/03/2025 10:14, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Stephen:
>> I did write to Yunlei and ask for an IPR disclosure.
>
> Yes, and thanks for doing that.
>
>> As far as I
>> know, Yunlei has never participat
Thank you for your close review.
I have made a PR in response to these comments:
PR https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/648
Detailed responses below.
## Editorial
> 10.1 »Security and Privacy Goals« starts with definitions
> (active/passive) that aren’t really Security/Privacy goa
Stewart,
Thanks for your review.
I have changed all but the last point, which I believe is correct as-is.
The final issue asked if we should replace the reference to RFC 5077
to RFC 8446, but this text is correct because the reference is to part
of the internal example structure in 5077 and 8446
Thank you for your review.
I have made a PR in response to these comments:
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/646
Detailed responses below.
> In section 6.1.7 "Authenticating for the Public Name", this repeats
> the a public_name should not have any ASCII dots in the wrong places
