[TLS] Re: I-D Action: draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03.txt

2025-03-18 Thread Kris Kwiatkowski
Hi John, Thanks for reporting that (again). Indeed, I was hoping this text could be added to draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design. Please, let me know if this text properly addresses your concern: https://github.com/post-quantum-cryptography/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/pull/35 Cheers, Kris > On

[TLS] Re: I-D Action: draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03.txt

2025-03-18 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 05:30:36PM +0700, Kris Kwiatkowski wrote: > Thanks for reporting that (again). Indeed, I was hoping this text > could be added to draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design. > > Please, let me know if this text properly addresses your concern: > https://github.com/post-quantum-cryptogra

[TLS] Re: I-D Action: draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03.txt

2025-03-18 Thread Bas Westerbaan
I support prohibiting key reuse, and a quick search shows several threads where this has been discussed before. But concerning the issue at hand, I would love to hear about the application where amortization is worthwhile. It puzzles me that this is worthwhile. The thing is that ML-KEM keygen is

[TLS] Re: I-D Action: draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03.txt

2025-03-18 Thread Filippo Valsorda
I supported and support prohibiting key reuse, and seem to remember multiple other supporting voices not named John. My impression (which could be mistaken because these debates are really painful to keep track of) is actually that objections are in the rough, if we count From headers rather tha

[TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-esni-23

2025-03-18 Thread Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mor

[TLS] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Last Call: (IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard

2025-03-18 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 9:41 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > > > On 17 Mar 2025, at 17:40, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > > The draft already contains the following guidance to address this point > on > > how to treat items marked as "D": > > > > "D: Indicates that the item is discouraged. This marking could

[TLS] Re: Last Call: (IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS) to Proposed Standard

2025-03-18 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 17 Mar 2025, at 17:40, Joseph Salowey wrote: > The draft already contains the following guidance to address this point on > how to treat items marked as "D": > > "D: Indicates that the item is discouraged. This marking could be used to > identify mechanisms that might result in problems if th