You might be interested in the draft being discussed here (I believe this
is on the agenda for next week as well):
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/dT5e5F1yWtFbs0dpESsWO-Cg0AM/
There's also this draft, which could be used to probe servers for ECH
support: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/
Hi Luke! Thanks for the thoughts!
I don't remember if there was a particular reason originally, probably just
an artifact of them being in separate sections. :-) Reusing it makes sense,
although there are some differences here:
Regarding mismatching signatures and whatnot, the original thinking w
Joseph Salowey has requested publication of draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-12 as
Informational on behalf of the TLS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/
___
TLS mailing list
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 00:22, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 28/02/2025 18:56, Sean Turner wrote:
> > In response to the WG adoption call, Dan Bernstein pointed out some
> > potential IPR (see [0]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in
> > accordance with BCP 79.
>
> While I don't thin
The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG (tls) to
consider the following document: - 'IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substa
Hiya,
On 12/03/2025 23:25, Christopher Patton wrote:
There's also this draft, which could be used to probe servers for ECH
support:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-wkech-05
Just on the status of the wkech draft - we're playing about
with (re-)implementing that using python
