[TLS] Re: MLKEM or Khyber KX

2024-11-02 Thread John Mattsson
Eric Rescorla wrote: >Is reuse of ML-KEM keys worse in some way than the reuse of ECDHE keys? No reuse of ephemeral keys is always bad. John From: Eric Rescorla Date: Saturday, 2 November 2024 at 02:09 To: John Mattsson Cc: Filippo Valsorda , Rich Salz , Bas Westerbaan , tls@ietf.org Subject

[TLS] Re: MLKEM or Khyber KX

2024-11-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 12:12 AM John Mattsson wrote: > Eric Rescorla wrote: > >Is reuse of ML-KEM keys worse in some way than the reuse of ECDHE keys? > > No reuse of ephemeral keys is always bad. > Right. Based on the discussion so far, I think it would be reasonable to have a mandate for TLS

[TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tls-reddy-composite-mldsa-00.txt

2024-11-02 Thread tirumal reddy
Hi all, The draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-reddy-composite-mldsa/ specifies how ML-DSA in combination with traditional algorithms can be used for authentication in TLS 1.3. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Regards, - Tiru -- Forwarded message - From: Date:

[TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tls-reddy-slhdsa-00.txt

2024-11-02 Thread tirumal reddy
Hi all, This draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-reddy-slhdsa/ specifies how the PQC signature scheme SLH-DSA can be used for authentication in TLS 1.3. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Regards, -Tiru -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 at 05:39