I support adoption of the draft, it is useful in telco networks.
-Tiru
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 08:18, Sean Turner wrote:
> At the TLS meeting at IETF 119 we discussed the Large Record Sizes for TLS
> and DTLS I-D; see [0] and [1]. There has been some list discussion; see [2]
> and [3]. The I-D h
Hi,
I support adoption of this draft.
Regards,
Valery.
> Just a reminder that this adoption call is still on going.
>
> spt
>
> > On Oct 24, 2024, at 22:46, Sean Turner wrote:
> >
> > At the TLS meeting at IETF 119 we discussed the Large Record Sizes for TLS
> and DTLS I-D; see [0] and [1]. T
> Just a reminder that this adoption call is still on going.
I support adoption.
One place I think we would use it is for links among datacenters that connect
our own software. (Excuse the clumsy wording, I can never tell inter- and
intra- apart)
__
I support the adoption of the draft
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 4:48 AM Sean Turner wrote:
>
> At the TLS meeting at IETF 119 we discussed the Large Record Sizes for TLS
> and DTLS I-D; see [0] and [1]. There has been some list discussion; see [2]
> and [3]. The I-D has been revised a few times sin
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:39:28PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>
> On 23/10/2024 18:29, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
> >
> > Unless I overlooked something, we don't have a draft out to assign a
> > SignatureAlgorithm to ML-DSA for use in TLS.
Nitpick: SignatureScheme. :-)
(SignatureAlgorithm is f
