[TLS] Re: [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-05 Thread Arnaud Taddei
Just to be clear, I agree with Eric and the text proposed is clear, I do not want either to delay this document My intervention in this email thread was simply to give support to Paul Vixie and give real world information vs some of the statements I was reading in the email thread. Let’s move

[TLS] Re: [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-05 Thread Andrew Campling
If appropriate, we could pick up this issue in our ECH Deployment Considerations draft. Happy to discuss in Dublin if there is interest in adding to our existing text. Andrew On 4 Oct 2024, at 19:39, Salz, Rich wrote:  * I would not be in favor of this. This is been intensely controver

[TLS] Re: [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-05 Thread Arnaud Taddei
Hi Erik, Agree it is out of the scope of this draft, but we have another vehicle that would be ideal to capture what you write We didn’t push it too much in the past 9+ months as per agreement with ADs and Working Group chairs, Eric and others to wait for ECH to be ratified first and on our