Ah fun, another issue in this document. So not only are write epoch
lifetimes unspecified and complex with 0-RTT, but read epoch lifetimes *are*
specified but *wrong*.
Section 4.2.1 says:
> Because DTLS records could be reordered, a record from epoch M may be
received after epoch N (where N > M)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:31 PM David Benjamin wrote:
> Ah fun, another issue in this document. So not only are write epoch
> lifetimes unspecified and complex with 0-RTT, but read epoch lifetimes
> *are* specified but *wrong*.
>
> Section 4.2.1 says:
>
> > Because DTLS records could be reordered
