[TLS] Re: ECH status

2024-09-17 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, Good to see things moving along, thanks. On 9/17/24 06:05, Joseph Salowey wrote: There has been some discussion of ECH proxy on the list, but something similar has already been discussed as pointed out in the thread and there does not appear to be consensus to make this sort of change in

[TLS] Re: TLS Interim (was Re: interim-2024-tls-01 interim approved)

2024-09-17 Thread Sean Turner
Hi! Another reminder that we have a virtual interim scheduled for 2024-10-01 @ 9am Pacific time. We are still working out the details but the topic is Trust Expressions / Trust Anchor Transition. Cheers, spt > On Sep 10, 2024, at 13:33, Sean Turner wrote: > > Hi! We have scheduled a virtual

[TLS] Re: DTLS 1.3 ACKs near the version transition

2024-09-17 Thread David Benjamin
Ah, I just noticed this text at the end of Section 7.1: > Note that in some cases it may be necessary to send an ACK which does not contain any record numbers. For instance, a client might receive an EncryptedExtensions message prior to receiving a ServerHello. Because it cannot decrypt the Encryp

[TLS] Re: DTLS 1.3 ACKs near the version transition

2024-09-17 Thread Bob Beck
> On Sep 17, 2024, at 5:28 PM, David Benjamin > wrote: > > Ah, I just noticed this text at the end of Section 7.1: > > > Note that in some cases it may be necessary to send an ACK which does not > > contain any record numbers. For instance, a client might receive an > > EncryptedExtensions