Changes to Section 5.1 look good to me!
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:00 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> I read the document [1]. I think it's ready for WGLC. I suggest one
> change. I find the use of "bootstrapping" in the title misleading. I
> suggest "Enabling TLS Encrypted ClientHello via DNS Servic
internet-dra...@ietf.org writes:
>This document specifies that outside of urgent security fixes, no new
>features will be approved for TLS 1.2.
In that case it would probably be a good idea to get TLS-LTS frozen in RFC
form rather than drafts before TLS 1.2 gets frozen:
https://datatracker.ietf
> In that case it would probably be a good idea to get TLS-LTS frozen in RFC
form rather than drafts before TLS 1.2 gets frozen:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gutmann-tls-lts-13
I'd like to see the WG adopt this draft. And then move it forward quickly so
it be published together (
Bootstrapping is REALLY not appropriate, since this is not TLS with ECH
enabling itself,
but rather a DNS mechanism enabling ECH.
But the document is ready for LC.
Y(J)S
-Original Message-
From: Salz, Rich
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:00 PM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS]Re: I-D A
