On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 09:39:32PM -0700, Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 8:58 PM Salz, Rich
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m a little skeptical of approaches that solve an entire problem
> > space with one architecture. I’m more skeptical of enough people
> > having the ability to read and underst
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:59 AM Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> Allowing various embedded and IoT stuff to migrate off of WebPKI would
> be of immense value. Such stuff using WebPKI has been source of gigantic
> amount of pain.
I agree with your second sentence very much, but I don’t understand your
f
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 09:11:34PM -0700, Nick Harper wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:58 PM Salz, Rich 40akamai@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> > Can we simplify things and solve just one problem?
> >
>
> >From my perspective, this draft does solve just one problem: how a server
> chooses a ce
Have you read the second draft (draft-beck-trust-anchor-ids)?
No. That’s on me, sorry.
___
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 06:13 Mike Shaver wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:59 AM Ilari Liusvaara
> wrote:
>
>> Allowing various embedded and IoT stuff to migrate off of WebPKI would
>> be of immense value. Such stuff using WebPKI has been source of gigantic
>> amount of pain.
>
>
> I agree w
