Gentle reminder this WGLC is still ongoing.
spt
> On Jun 12, 2024, at 14:10, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> This email starts the working group last call for "Bootstrapping TLS
> Encrypted ClientHello with DNS Service Bindings” I-D, located here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-sv
Hi! David Benjamin submitted the following PR to unify some prose related to
certificate negotiation in TLS 1.3 (ClientHello/Certificate and
CertificateRequest/Certificate are now nice and symmetric):
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1361
As this has been suggested post WGLC, we need to e
Added a couple of minor comments; overall this change seems OK.
Cheers,
Andrei
-Original Message-
From: Sean Turner
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 10:15 AM
To: TLS List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS]Consensus Call: -rfc8446bis PR #1361
Hi! David Benjamin submitted the following PR to unify so
Thanks, Andrei! I have updated the PR to address your comments.
For some context, this came about because I noticed that the text in RFC
8446 around the X.509 Key Usage extension was inconsistently applied to
only the server certificate half and not the client certificate half. As
checking consist
Thanks, I have no further comments and support merging this change.
Cheers,
Andrei
From: David Benjamin
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 12:03 PM
To: Andrei Popov
Cc: Sean Turner ; TLS List
Subject: Re: [TLS]Re: [EXTERNAL] Consensus Call: -rfc8446bis PR #1361
Thanks, Andrei! I have updated the PR
I have read the document and think it is ready, minus the issues Rich
and Raghu identified.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 9:27 AM Sean Turner wrote:
>
> Gentle reminder this WGLC is still ongoing.
>
> spt
>
> > On Jun 12, 2024, at 14:10, Sean Turner wrote:
> >
> > This email starts the working group l
