The TLS WG is meeting at IETF 119 for 2 hours on Tuesday, March 19, 2024 from
0930-1130 (local time) [0] in the Plaza Terrace Room [2]. The chairs would like
to solicit input from the WG for agenda topics. Please send your agenda topics
request and an estimate for how much time you will need to
Hi! Friendly reminder that the I-D submission deadline for IETF 119 is [1]:
2024-03-04 (Monday) Internet-Draft submission cut-off (for all Internet-Drafts,
including -00) by UTC 23:59. Upload using the I-D Submission Tool [2]
Cheers,
spt
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates/
Hi Sean,
I would like to speak briefly on my draft TLS flag that signals client
support for mTLS [1], and if possible to have a call for adoption.
I would need ~5 mins.
Regards,
Jonathan
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-jhoyla-req-mtls-flag-01
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, 16:05 Sean Tu
Circling back to this thread, we're now looking at prototyping the TLS
parts in BoringSSL, on both the client (Chrome) and the server side. Let us
know if you have any thoughts on the proposal!
(Nothing that would prevent us from changing details, of course. But as
there are a lot of pieces here,
Oh, I should have added: I put together an informal "explainer"-style
document to try to describe the high-level motivations and goals a bit
better. The format is adapted more from the web platform end, which likes
to have separate explainer and specification documents, but it seemed a
good style f
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:31 PM David Benjamin
wrote:
> Oh, I should have added: I put together an informal "explainer"-style
> document to try to describe the high-level motivations and goals a bit
> better. The format is adapted more from the web platform end [...]
>
There is a very uncharitab
