Hi Dennis,
> Can you expand more on the intended use case? When would it make
sense
> to use a RFC7924-like mechanism over TLS 1.3's session resumption?
>
> I skimmed RFC 7924 and session resumption seems strictly better as
it's
> already widely deployed, allows for the DH handshake to be optio
>
> If you are going to do this, you might as well go the whole hog and
> provide a mechanism that allows the client to say if it already has a cert
> on file for that particular host, e.g. by means of a digest.
>
If clients cache intermediates as they go, then reporting that list to a
server is a
Hi Simon,
On 15/08/2023 03:41, Simon Mangel wrote:
We believe it to be useful in cases where the network bandwidth is
severely restricted, such that one would want to keep the number of
"full" handshakes as small as possible.
Session resumption ticket lifetimes are limited to 7 days in TLS 1.3
