>
> I'm not sure I would agree that a 3-8 MB handshake to preserve the status
> quo is exactly low hanging fruit.
>
If we use Dilithium2 for every signature, we're looking at about 17kB extra
— not 3-8MB. ICA suppression removes one public key and signature, so 3.7kB.
This is where looking to see
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 04:47:09AM +, Kampanakis, Panos wrote:
>
> About the tlsflags, make sense. It would simplify things too. The
> impression I got from the old draft-thomson-tls-sic thread and the
> tlsflags draft was that it mandates an acknowledgement. I will
> confirm with Yoav.
The
Hi folks,
Following up on the TLS WG meeting in IETF 112 and draft update in December,
this email begins an adoption call for draft-salowey-tls-rfc8447bis, located
here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salowey-tls-rfc8447bis/
This adoption call will last for two weeks. Please repl
