Re: [TLS] [Uta] OCSP in RFC7525bis

2022-01-31 Thread Hubert Kario
On Friday, 21 January 2022 05:51:22 CET, Ryan Sleevi wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:31 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: This sounds a lot like a "SHOULD BUT WE KNOW YOU WONT". Why would a client deliberately fail a connection when the problem might be a flaw with an unrelated network servic

Re: [TLS] [Uta] OCSP in RFC7525bis

2022-01-31 Thread Ryan Sleevi
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:08 PM Hubert Kario wrote: > > Browsers are the only software that use browser's implementation of > certificate > verification and revocation. > > And while they are significant users of TLS, they're definitely not the > only important users of TLS. In the context of

[TLS] [Errata Verified] RFC6520 (6825)

2022-01-31 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6520, "Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Heartbeat Extension". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6825