Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > As you are an experienced reviewer, I really appreciate all your > commentary, and I think an experienced, not-author, view is very useful! +1 -- thanks, Stephen! Most of the PRs have been reviewed and merged. There's a couple lingering PRs t

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for Deprecating FFDH(E) Ciphersuites in TLS

I've posted a revision here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bartle-tls-deprecate-ffdh/ > On Jul 30, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Carrick Bartle > wrote: > > Sorry, the title will be changed in the next version, which I'll be p

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in TLS

I support adoption. > On Jul 29, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > This is a working group call for adoption of Deprecating Obsolete Key > Exchange Methods in TLS (draft-aviram-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex-00 >

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in TLS

I also support adoption. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:16 PM Carrick Bartle wrote: > > I support adoption. > > On Jul 29, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > This is a working group call for adoption of Deprecating Obsolete Key > Exchange Methods in TLS (draft-aviram-tls-deprecate-obsolete

Re: [TLS] esni-draft-13 suggestion

Hiya, On 09/08/2021 19:07, Christopher Wood wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: As you are an experienced reviewer, I really appreciate all your commentary, and I think an experienced, not-author, view is very useful! +1 -- thanks, Stephen! Most of the PRs have been r

Re: [TLS] Advancing draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Hi Dan, If memory serves, this came via discussion on the list in July 2021 after my presentation at IETF 105. At the time we presented a choice between two main approaches: one where each part of the combination was fully negotiated with corresponding data structures for everything, and a sim

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in TLS

I support adoption. David On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:24 AM Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > I also support adoption. > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:16 PM Carrick Bartle > wrote: > > > > I support adoption. > > > > On Jul 29, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote: > > > > This is a working group c

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption

This document is mostly fine. The text on use of client certificates isn't particularly clear. The key piece of information that a reader is going to need is that a resumed connection will include any (and potentially all) client authentication. I found the meat of the flag definition hard to