On Jan 6, 2021, at 1:24 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> [Joe] I created a pull request
> (https://github.com/emu-wg/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/pull/17) with the
> proposed labels. Is this change going to cause significant problems for
> implementation?
After making this change:
$ git diff src/
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:54 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Changing Subject: and adding tls@ ...
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:04:02PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > I'm going to respond here to your DISCUSS points, but leave the comments
> to our issue tracker. Lucas has voluntee
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your input.
As I am currently dealing with a DoS from the IESG, I'm going to just file
issues for these and promise to get back to you. (You are flagged on them, and
I've included some off-the-cuff responses there in case you want to add more.)
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021, at 04:02
Trimming this down.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 14:53, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> I didn't expect to find much appetite for changes, but I wouldn't be doing
> my job if I didn't ask the question. It's a little unusual for something
> outside the core protocol to change the behavior of an extension defin
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:50:43PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Trimming this down.
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 14:53, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > I didn't expect to find much appetite for changes, but I wouldn't be doing
> > my job if I didn't ask the question. It's a little unusual for somethin
I'm not sure that the other discussions are productive any more, so I'll fix my
errors...
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021, at 15:04, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > This isn't an "Updates: X" moment at all in my view. Extensions to TLS
> > have added new handshake messages (certificate status for instance) with
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I'm not sure that the other discussions are productive any more, so I'll fix
> my errors...
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021, at 15:04, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> > > This isn't an "Updates: X" moment at all in my view. Extensions to TLS
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:41:50AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 4:47 AM, Mohit Sethi M wrote:
> > What I am gathering is that this commitment message should instead be
> > made into a confirmation message, i.e. it should only be sent after
> > receiving TLS Finished from the cli
