Hi all,
Sorry for the slow processing time -- my queue is still longer than I am
happy with.
There's a few apparent inconsistencies that we'll need to tighten up,
but I don't think there's anything particularly problematic.
I made a PR for most of the editorial stuff:
https://github.com/tlswg/dtl
I support adoption.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:32 PM Christopher Patton wrote:
> I support adoption.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>> I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, S
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:21 PM Salz, Rich
wrote:
>
> I support this and will help work on it.
>
I also support adoption.
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
___
I support adoption of this work.
B.
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 6:18 PM, Christopher Wood wrote:
>
> This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As
> mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446
> (as identified below). No other semantic chan
