[TLS] AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-06

Thanks for putting together the -06 based on my preliminary comments, and my apologies for taking so long to get back to it. It turns out that going through the 80-odd documents we update takes a while! I have a bunch of suggestions that are basically editorial, that I'll make a pull request for

[TLS] TLS@IETF108: Requests

Hi! If you are interested in volunteering to take minutes or be jabber scribe please let the chairs know (chairs-...@ietf.org). spt ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] TLS@IETF108: Meeting Logistics

The following information can also be found in the agenda: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/agenda/agenda-108-tls-03 # TLS@IETF018 ## Logistics ### Time Tuesday 2020-07-28 14:10 UTC ### Meeting Information Meetecho (a/v and chat): https://gce.conf.meetecho.com/conference/?group=tls&short

Re: [TLS] [OPSEC] Call For Adoption: draft-wang-opsec-tls-proxy-bp

Hi Stephen, Thanks for your feedback. I’d like to clarify, given the reality today that CDN/load balancers and enterprises deploy TLS proxy, this draft is merely to lay out a baseline guidance to the implementation and operation[1]. It is not meant to analyze "use and abuse" or "pros and cons