In my view, as one of the three designated experts, we already have the only
channel we need, it's the "approved" column.
Anything else -- anything more -- runs counter to our principal of interop over
all.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://w
Brian,
{I have been on the httpbis list, but I'm not right now, and I know that
w3 and IETF do not share their whitelists, so this might not work}
I was thinking about something-something-certificate yesterday while
cleaning/swimming
my pool. (A long thankless task, as the pool is not heated, w
* It seems like it should appear with a "Recommended" value of "No", and no
value in the TLS 1.3 column, since the document says "The Middlebox Security
Protocol builds on TLS 1.2". [3]
* Is that what's being proposed?
Yes.
___
TLS mailing li
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:02 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>- It seems like it should appear with a "Recommended" value of "No",
>and no value in the TLS 1.3 column, since the document says "The Middlebox
>Security Protocol builds on TLS 1.2". [3]
>
>
>
>- Is that what's being proposed?
Thanks to Chris for uploading the WG version of the draft.
If you have some time over the next couple of weeks please take the time to
review this draft. The intent is to issue a WGLC after IETF 108 barring any
discontent prior that.
spt
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 23:28, internet-dra...@ietf.org wr
