Re: [TLS] Consultation About Assignment of ExtensionTypes

2020-06-18 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every time. I do think signalling opprobrium somehow would be right here. Not sure how best we ought do that though tbh. Cheers, S. On 13/06/2020 18:20, Yoav Nir wrote: > Hi. > > I’m pos

Re: [TLS] Consultation About Assignment of ExtensionTypes

2020-06-18 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would > barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every > time. > > I do think signalling opprobrium somehow would be right > here. Not sure how best we ought do th

Re: [TLS] Consultation About Assignment of ExtensionTypes

2020-06-18 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, On 19/06/2020 01:36, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hiya, >> >> I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would >> barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every >> time. >> >> I do think signalling opprobrium someh

Re: [TLS] Consultation About Assignment of ExtensionTypes

2020-06-18 Thread Rob Sayre
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:20 AM Yoav Nir wrote: > > To re-iterate, the policy for the registry is “Specification Required” and > a specification is available. Unless we hear convincing arguments to the > contrary, we will approve this allocation. We just prefer to have the > kerfuffle before the