I have started working on the cTLS implementation and will continue doing so
together with my co-worker Hanno.
A bit more details:
We have re-based the 1.3 implementation* to the development branch of Mbed TLS
and we have refactored the code so that we can put a new messaging layer in
place**,
I support moving both drafts to standards track.
For ECH, there is a definite need to encrypt the SNI and other fields as a
complement to using encrypted DNS. We have implemented draft versions, and will
implement and use the final certain of ECH + HTTPSSVC.
For cTLS, this is a prime candidat
Joseph Salowey has requested publication of
draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-05 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
TLS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer/
___
FWIW, I’m less skeptical of standards-track for cTLS, but still not sure. ARM
and mBedTLS are important.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
