Issues
--
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+1/-0/💬8)
1 issues created:
- Restrict ECHO inner/outer variance for interop purposes (by sftcd)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/223
5 issues received 8 new comments:
- #223 Restrict ECHO inner/outer variance for interop p
On 25/04/2020, 11:43, "Thomas Fossati" wrote:
> On 25/04/2020, 11:11, "Thomas Fossati" wrote:
> > On 25/04/2020, 01:30, "Christopher Wood"
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, at 2:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > > 1. Allowing implicit CIDs is very recent (it was introduced in
> > > > -34)
>
Hi,
Thanks Chris for your thoughts.
Yes, it seems that specific formal analysis is needed, since we're dealing with
the new
situation that - in contrast to TLS 1.3 - shortened or omitted fields in the
DTLS 1.3 headers
(e.g. epoch, length, CID) introduce a notion of implicit context to a record
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, at 2:37 AM, Thomas Fossati wrote:
> On 25/04/2020, 11:43, "Thomas Fossati" wrote:
> > On 25/04/2020, 11:11, "Thomas Fossati" wrote:
> > > On 25/04/2020, 01:30, "Christopher Wood"
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, at 2:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > > > 1. Allowi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 2:43 AM Hanno Becker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Chris for your thoughts.
>
> Yes, it seems that specific formal analysis is needed, since we're
> dealing with the new
> situation that - in contrast to TLS 1.3 - shortened or omitted fields in
> the DTLS 1.3 headers
> (e.g. epo
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF.
Title : Compact TLS 1.3
Authors : Eric Rescorla
Richard Barnes
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, at 01:56, chris - wrote:
> However, the formal
> models of [1,2] assume reliable transport (i.e., TCP): failure to
> deliver packets in order is deemed an attack. Therefore, the
> definitions would need to be changed in order to account for the case
> of DTLS. (I'm not sur
