Thanks Ekr. I have created PR https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/138
implementing the suggestion.
From: Eric Rescorla
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 4:30 PM
To: Hanno Becker
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] [DTLS] ACK's for post-handshake authentication
Hi Ekr, Martin, Chris,
I have created https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/137 as a first attempt
to explicitly mention
that multiple post-handshake messages should be treated via independent state
machines.
Let me know what you think.
From: TLS on behalf
Hi Jonathan,
I have created https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/139/ as an attempt to
clarify
the distinction between when to ACK and what to ACK.
Let me know what you think.
Best,
Hanno
From: Jonathan Hammell
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 2:54 PM
To: Hann
Hi Hanno,
This is much clearer to me. I see that you have removed the sentence
I was having a problem with in the bullet: "Implementations MUST NOT
send ACKs for handshake messages which they discard as out-of-order,
because otherwise those messages will not be retransmitted";
logically, I believ
The draft looks good. I have a few minor nits and suggestions.
Section 3, Fourth bullet: s/TLS hadshake/TLS handshake
Section 3, Fourth bullet: To eliminate possible confusion, what is
meant by "certificate’s working key" could be defined more precisely.
Section 3.2, Last paragraph: s/Automated
