I'd remove "With these goals in mind" from the last sentence, but the new
charter (with the "resources" edit) even if my suggestion isn't accepted.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
LGTM, I agree with using “resource" instead of “size”…
My understanding is that “security” is broad enough to cover new authentication
mechanisms
and that “privacy" will be broad enough to cover “metadata protection” if
needed, correct?
B.
> On Jan 17, 2020, at 4:31 AM, Christopher Wood wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I'd remove "With these goals in mind" from the last sentence, but the
> new charter (with the "resources" edit) even if my suggestion isn't
> accepted.
To confirm, you'd replace this:
"With these goals in mind, the working group will also p
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, at 9:29 AM, Benjamin Beurdouche wrote:
> LGTM, I agree with using “resource" instead of “size”…
> My understanding is that “security” is broad enough to cover new
> authentication mechanisms
> and that “privacy" will be broad enough to cover “metadata protection”
> if needed
> "The working group will also place a priority in minimizing gratuitous
> changes to (D)TLS."
>Right? That seems fine to me!
Great, thanks.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Issues
--
* tlswg/tls-subcerts (+0/-1/💬2)
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #43 Add support for advertising supported signature schemes (1 by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/issues/43
- #41 Assign codepoint for delegated_credentials extension (1 by chris-wood)
