On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:59 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> Since Rob quoted this:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019, at 09:42, Rob Sayre wrote:
> > with the exception that there is no DTLS version of SSLv2 or SSLv3,
>
> also on this list is TLS 1.0. DTLS 1.0 is TLS 1.1.
>
Yes, but that's presumably an
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:27 PM Kaduk, Ben wrote:
>
>> The one concrete one that I remember (and can't attribute to the HTMLized
>> version dropping stuff) is RFC 7030 only in the header.
>>
>> I guess we can check what we want to do to DTLS as
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:58 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Rob Sayre wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:27 PM Kaduk, Ben wrote:
>>
>>> The one concrete one that I remember (and can't attribute to the
>>> HTMLized version dropping stuff) is RFC 7030 only in th
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:56 AM Rob Sayre wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:58 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Rob Sayre wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:27 PM Kaduk, Ben wrote:
>>>
The one concrete one that I remember (and can't attribute t
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:24 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:56 AM Rob Sayre wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:58 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Rob Sayre wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:27 PM Kaduk, Ben wro
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6347,
"Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5903
--
Type: Editorial
Reported by:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 03:41:44PM -0500, Russ Housley wrote:
> Ben:
>
> I have made the edits indicated in my response below. I cannot pot it until
> the I-D repository reopens.
I'm happy to approve a manual posting sooner if you want, though I do not
think it would have a huge impact on time-
