Hi Martin,
Thanks for the reply! Please see inline below.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 6:26 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> There are two points here to consider:
>
> 1. Whether the key that we are feeding into this process is going to be
> used exclusively for that purpose, or whether it might be used
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
> --Section 3.3 --
> Probably worth expanding "DOS" at first use.
Actually, "DoS" (with the small "o") is in the RFC Editor's list of
abbreviations that do not need to be expanded. That, of course,
doesn't mean that it *shouldn't* be expanded. But it should be
spelled with the small "o", in any
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, at 00:56, Christopher Wood wrote:
> > In thinking about the first point, we might want to consider whether
> > the KDF that is used in the importer might need to be used in other
> > ways.
>
> To be clear, you're referring to HKDF and its role in deriving ipsk
> from eps
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://w
