On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, at 09:52, Patton,Christopher J wrote:
> Is there any indication in the UI that a DC was negotiated?
There is not. We don't have any other machinery built yet, which is part of
why I don't recommend that people use this just yet.
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2925 includes the (incomplete)
analysis done by Eric Kinnear.
See also
https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#rfc.section.8 and
subsequent sections
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
ht
Thanks for presenting this work. I really like this and I think
it'd be really useful for the use cases we have (IoT, M2M).
One comment: from a quick skimming of the draft, I'm not sure I
understand what the stated expectations on the transport layer are?
Since it's cTLS and not cDTLS I'd have t
Draft minutes from today's and Tuesday's sessions are available at [1]. Please
take a look and provide edits and corrections as needed. We'll submit the final
version next week.
Many thanks to Rich and Patrick for taking notes!
Best,
Chris
[1] https://github.com/tlswg/wg-materials/blob/master/
