Re: [TLS] A flags extension

2019-04-02 Thread Hubert Kario
On Monday, 1 April 2019 23:05:41 CEST Martin Thomson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 12:40, Hubert Kario wrote: > > > > would possibly reduce the size of is ServerHello or > > > > EncryptedExtensions > > > > > > Those are messages where we have size pressure. > > > > why? in what use case? > >

[TLS] TLSv1.3 - purpose of _0 in {client, server}_application_traffic_secret_0

2019-04-02 Thread M K Saravanan
Hi, In TLSv1.3, what is the purpose of _0 suffix in the following: client_application_traffic_secret_0 server_application_traffic_secret_0 with regards, Saravanan ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] TLSv1.3 - purpose of _0 in {client, server}_application_traffic_secret_0

2019-04-02 Thread Steven Valdez
They indicate that those are the initial client/server application traffic secrets, which are then updated via KeyUpdates (section 7.2, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13#section-7.2). On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:20 PM M K Saravanan wrote: > Hi, > > In TLSv1.3, what is the purpose of

Re: [TLS] A flags extension

2019-04-02 Thread Christian Huitema
On 4/2/2019 4:42 AM, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Monday, 1 April 2019 23:05:41 CEST Martin Thomson wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 12:40, Hubert Kario wrote: > would possibly reduce the size of is ServerHello or > EncryptedExtensions Those are messages where we have size pressure. >>>