[TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10

2019-03-21 Thread Wang Haiguang
Hello, everyone. Attached is an updated version to our personal draft on draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10. The target of the draft is to use identity as raw public key over TLS. Idenitty-based signature (IBS) algorithms are used for peer/server authentication. The draft has been

Re: [TLS] draft-kinnear-tls-client-net-address comments

2019-03-21 Thread Dan Wing
Good point. Furthering that point: - what about DTLS/SRTP when that is used with ICE (RFC8445 and its precursor RFC5245) and QUIC (c.f., https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/). Need guidance in the document to use ICE and/or quic-address-extension, as well as what it means if they differ (heaven

Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10

2019-03-21 Thread Eric Rescorla
I have taken an initial look at this draft [0]. Comments follow. First the motivation for this technique appears rather weak. Primarily, you argue that a PKI is complicated to implement and this is simpler. However, there are a number of factors to consider. First, I believe the design you have s

[TLS] draft-kinnear-tls-client-net-address and 'public address'

2019-03-21 Thread Geoff Keating
I see this draft describes the format of a network address as NetworkAddress.address carries the raw network-order byte-wise representation of the client IP address. ... Clients which receive a non-empty NetworkAddress extension may use it to record their public IP address. This

[TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis

2019-03-21 Thread Urmas Vanem
Hi! I try to find authoritative explanation for some aspects in RFC 5246 (TLS 1..2). I hope this is right place to ask. Background: Company A has client/browser and company B has web server. Server has certificate and it also requires certificate from client. Client do not advertise signature_