On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 5:03 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 07:23, David Benjamin wrote:
> > > while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does
> > > specifically
> > > allow the client to advertise higher values than the protocol versions
> or
> > > extensions
At the TLS@IETF103 session, there was interest in adopting
draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as an experimental WG
item, provided that it's limited to external PSKs with certificates
for the initial handshake. This email is to determine whether there is
WG consensus to adopt this draft (
On Friday, 25 January 2019 17:23:22 CET David Benjamin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 5:03 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 07:23, David Benjamin wrote:
> > > > while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does
> > > > specifically
> > > > allow the client to a
Of course, I support WG adoption. And, if the document is adopted, I am
willing to continue as author.
Russ
> On Jan 25, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Christopher Wood
> wrote:
>
> At the TLS@IETF103 session, there was interest in adopting
> draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as an experiment
I support adoption.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:53 PM Russ Housley wrote:
> Of course, I support WG adoption. And, if the document is adopted, I am
> willing to continue as author.
>
> Russ
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Christopher Wood <
> christopherwoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > At the
