Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Authentication using ETSI TS 103 097 and IEEE 1609.2 certificates

2018-10-02 Thread Russ Housley
The document says: /* Managed by IANA */ enum { X509(0), RawPublicKey(2), 1609Dot2(?), /* Number 3 will be requested for 1609.2 */ (255) 103097(?), /* Number 4 will be requested for 103097 */ (255) } CertificateType; Two

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Authentication using ETSI TS 103 097 and IEEE 1609.2 certificates

2018-10-02 Thread William Whyte
Hi Ilari, >> - The construction looks like it mixes different kinds of structures: 1609.2 Data of type signed versus TLS 1.3 signature. I do not think this is cryptographically kosher. In fact, I think the call for "extreme care" for certain kinds of modifications from TLS 1.3 specificatio

Re: [TLS] Request to register value in TLS extension registry

2018-10-02 Thread Peter Gutmann
[CC'd back to the TLS list because this affects other TLS work as well] Benjamin Kaduk writes: >Having looked a bit harder, it seems that perhaps I need to point out that, >if you want IANA to allocate a value, you need to *ask IANA for it*. The >tls-reg-rev...@ietf.org list is not a supported