Re: [TLS] Double-Checking after TLS 1.3 pre-RFC copy edits

2018-07-29 Thread Ilari Liusvaara
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 06:41:09AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > The text here isn't totally generic, as it refers to scalar multiplication > and u-coordinate > point input. So, if we had some other ECDH-type thing that didn't have these > concepts, then we would have yet new text. > > In the in

Re: [TLS] Double-Checking after TLS 1.3 pre-RFC copy edits

2018-07-29 Thread Eric Rescorla
Thanks! On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 06:41:09AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > The text here isn't totally generic, as it refers to scalar > multiplication > > and u-coordinate > > point input. So, if we had some other ECDH-type thing tha

Re: [TLS] Last Call: (Example Handshake Traces for TLS 1.3) to Informational RFC

2018-07-29 Thread Martin Thomson
Thanks Mark, I hadn't recorded the messages individually because it was a little tricky, but by doing so both of your concerns should be addressed (at a modest cost of 7 extra pages of hex). For example, this now shows: {server} send a ServerHello handshake message ServerHello (90 oct