Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-06-19 Thread Hubert Kario
On Monday, 18 June 2018 21:10:05 CEST Ben Personick wrote: > I can only support ecdsa_rsa unless I have an ECC certificate to support > ecsda_ecsde ciphers. that is software limitation, not protocol limitation > Since TLS 1.3 will continue to allow ecdsa_rsa ciphers, there will be no > push

Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-06-19 Thread Salz, Rich
> Since TLS 1.3 will continue to allow ecdsa_rsa ciphers, there will be no > push to move towards offering them, because of various 'reasons'. I think you mean ECDH with RSA. But yes, that’s a common situation, few organizations pay to add security until they’re “forced” to do so. You’re not

Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-06-19 Thread Ben Personick
Hi Rich, Yes, I meant ECDHE_ECDSA and ECDHE_RSA are both supported in TLS 1.3, I’d been lead to believe that all RSA based ciphers were not supported. Having seem some further responses, it appears it is only the NON ECDHE RSA Based ciphers which are having support dropped in TLS 1.3 Ie al

Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-06-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Ben Personick > wrote: > > Yes, I meant ECDHE_ECDSA and ECDHE_RSA are both supported in TLS 1.3, I’d > been lead to believe that all RSA based ciphers were not supported. > > Having seem some further responses, it appears it is only the NON ECDHE RSA > Ba

Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-06-19 Thread Martin Rex
Ben Personick wrote: > > (My apology for the long email, I did not have time to write a shorter one) > We are currently evaluating when to begin offering ECC Certificates > based cypto on our websites. > > Despite the advantages to doing this in TLS 1.2, there is a lot of > push-back to wait un