We are about to publish draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00. The TLS extension
defined in this I-D takes into account what we heard from the discussion
regarding TLS visibility and draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-00 in Prague.
Specifically, it provides an opt-in capability for both the TLS cl
Sigh:-(
IMO the WG shouldn't touch this terrible proposal with a
bargepole.
And it remains outside the WG's charter I think. (It would be
a good idea if the chairs would clarify that a re-charter would
be needed were the WG to go bonkers and adopt a terrible idea
like this.)
I guess I'll need t
> For starters, though, I'd be interested answers from the authors
> to two quick questions, though I suspect I can guess 'em:
>
> 1. TLS1.3 has had significant formal analysis. Did the authors
> or other proponents here do any such work and if so can you send
> a pointer to your results? If not,
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> > For starters, though, I'd be interested answers from the authors
> > to two quick questions, though I suspect I can guess 'em:
> >
> > 1. TLS1.3 has had significant formal analysis. Did the authors
> > or other proponents here do any such wo
Russ,
On 02/10/17 22:43, Russ Housley wrote:
>> For starters, though, I'd be interested answers from the authors to
>> two quick questions, though I suspect I can guess 'em:
>>
>> 1. TLS1.3 has had significant formal analysis. Did the authors or
>> other proponents here do any such work and if s
